If, by 2026, there are no longer any slim people to be seen on the beach, then the recommendations and measures put forward by doctors, the Health Board, the National Institute for Health Development (TAI), ministers, ‘scientists’ and the World Health Organisation (WHO) are 100 per cent wrong and misguided.
Being slim is a matter of opinion: in comparison to whom is one person slimmer than another, and who decides what constitutes a slim person? In this article, we shall examine the subject of slimness; according to many enlightened spiritual scholars, humanity in today’s world is sick, overweight, and has ‘lost’ its reason.
The result of recommendations from doctors, the Health Board, the National Institute for Health Development and the WHO – you no longer see slim, healthy people on the beach

There are women on the beach who not only have voluminous breasts, but also 2-3 layers underneath them. The woman’s body has 2-3 furrows at the front and a large bottom at the back. It’s no wonder that shops no longer sell nice clothes, as there are no longer any customers for them – all that’s needed are baggy, shapeless garments.
Men have bigger bellies than women who are nine months pregnant. Teenage boys have breasts as large as real, soft women’s breasts. How can that even be?
If you no longer see slim people on the beach, then the recommendations and measures put forward by doctors, the Health Board, the National Institute for Health Development, ministers, scientists and the WHO are 100 per cent wrong and misguided
People don’t talk about it, as if it were something to be ashamed of. And that’s exactly how it should be. Unfortunately, most of the people in charge of the family’s meals are women, and women bear a great deal of responsibility in this regard. If you say anything to them, they take offence. But it is the parents – usually the mothers – who feed their children until they become ill and overweight.
“I know a saying that goes: if a man or woman, standing upright and looking down, cannot see their own genitals, then it’s time for them to sort out their diet and lifestyle. Another saying goes that if you can’t tie your shoelaces whilst standing and bending forwards, you need to change your lifestyle.” — Veiko Huuse


“We are living in an era where chronic metabolic disorders are no longer the exception, but the rule. Being overweight and metabolic syndrome are not merely aesthetic concerns, but a systemic biological crisis, often exacerbated by outdated dietary recommendations and an excess of carbohydrates.”
— (General medical observation on metabolic dysfunction)
People who are overweight and have a large waist circumference are already unwell. They suffer from metabolic dysfunction, not to mention strain on their joints, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, insulin resistance, hormonal imbalances, and so on. All these people have followed the recommendations of the Health Board, the National Institute for Health Development (TAI), doctors, ministers, scientists, and state institutions. Furthermore, WHO recommendations and vaccination schedules have been followed, and every possible medication has been taken; the list of side effects for which is endless.
You slather on sun cream full of chemicals and let it bake into your skin, turning it into cancer. It is an endless horror and an avalanche of disease. Wearing sunglasses and eating rapeseed oil – everything that has been recommended so far is actually the wrong way round. Tip: Whatever people advise, do the opposite.
The readings for a person considered ‘normal’ by scientific standards
To understand just how far off the mark the image of modern society is, it is worth looking at what traditional science considers to be a biologically normal and healthy body:
- Body Mass Index (BMI): For both men and women, this should fall within the range of 18.5 to 24.9. Anything above that is considered overweight or obesity.
WOMAN (height 170 cm):
- Normal weight range: approx. 53.5-72.2 kg.
- External (subcutaneous) body fat percentage: 21% – 32% of body mass
- Visceral fat levels: A value between 1 and 6 (low to optimal).
- Muscle mass (skeletal muscle): approx. 24%-30% (i.e., around 15-20 kg).
- Waist circumference: Definitely under 80 cm.
MEN (height 175 cm):
- Normal weight range: approx. 56.7-76.6 kg.
- External (subcutaneous) body fat percentage: 10%-20% of body weight
- Visceral fat levels: A value between 1 and 9 (low to optimal).
- Muscle mass (skeletal muscle): approx. 33%-40% (i.e., around 23-28 kg).
- Waist circumference: Definitely under 94 cm.
If your readings fall outside this range, chronic inflammatory processes have already begun in your body.
It is this very science that has established reasonable benchmarks for a healthy and slim person. However, science has turned the food and healthcare systems on their head – which does not support the achievement of these targets.
The army of toxins surrounding us
The chemicals you put on your skin, the toxins in your body and in the environment – including pollutants falling from the sky, heavy metals, fragrances and pesticides – are things we come into contact with every day. Plastic in water, seed oils, endocrine disruption – take a look around to see what’s happening in your body and around you. Every day, people are poisoning themselves and the environment.
People buy toxic shampoos from the shop, wash their hair with them, then buy laundry detergents and breathe them in every day in bed. Clothes also contain the chemicals that are transferred to the skin from washing powder. You end up eating the residue from the washing-up liquid off your plates, because traces of it always remain. All these toxins are ‘honestly’ peddled to you in TV adverts and on social media.
“We come into contact with hundreds of synthetic chemicals every day that act as endocrine disruptors (EDCs). These substances mimic or block our body’s natural hormones, directly causing obesity, infertility and metabolic crises.”
— (Toxicological Consensus on the Effects of Environmental Toxins)
People here on this 3D Earth have, over time, become the most foolish and brutal of all human beings. They poison their food to kill live insects, and then eat the poison themselves, believing that it won’t kill them. Today, because of this food contamination (‘protection against insects’), people are unable to have children. In addition, eco-labels (greenwashing) have been created to encourage people to pay more for non-toxic products. This strawberry is not pesticide-free if pesticide spraying is taking place on the farmland next to it. How much more stupid can you get? Honestly, where’s the common sense?
In the 1940s and 1950s, people were healthier and slimmer. How can that even be?

In 1940-1950 people were healthy and slim-Fonte.News
Looking back at society in the 1940s and 1950s, there was no such widespread obesity in beach scenes or street scenes as there is today. Official scientific and statistical data confirm that, for example, in the early 1960s, the proportion of obese people in society was only around 10 per cent (today it is more than five times higher, approaching 70 per cent). How could a generation that knew nothing of gyms, heart rate monitors or special diets have been so much purer, healthier and slimmer in biological terms?
The answer is simple: at that time, there were very few advocates of the ‘system’ (such as the WHO, the Health Board, the National Institute for Health Development, doctors, etc.), or they had no influence whatsoever over people’s daily diets. Government bodies did not aggressively dictate what people should eat, and food pyramids – which instructed people to stuff themselves with carbohydrates and grains – had not yet been invented or actively promoted. There were no predecessors to the National Institute for Health Development (TAI) whose role was to force-feed the public with low-fat, sugar-packed, chemical-laden products bought from the shops.
People of that era lived according to sound judgement and a deep, genuine love for themselves and their families. The food was made from genuine ingredients: home-grown vegetables, pure butter, lard and real meat. No one was familiar with terms such as ‘ultra-processed food’ or ‘seed oils’. Instead of rapeseed, soya and sunflower oils (industrial, rancid toxins), natural animal fats were used, which kept hormones in balance and the metabolism active. The food wasn’t full of hormones, pesticides, preservatives, or GMOs.
Buying and eating food was a sacred ritual, not a mindless dopamine rush and sugar binge in the midst of a hectic day. People were more aware of their bodies’ actual needs because they listened to their own biological instincts rather than to adverts on television or social media. It was a time when food was medicine and a source of vitality, rather than an addictive weapon of mass destruction designed by corporations.
“The result of the recommendations of doctors, the Health Board, the Institute for Health Development, and the WHO – on the beach, on the street, in social media photos, and in a largely visible society, you no longer see slim and healthy people. What is this, if not the doom of humanity?” – Veiko Huuse
Is it even possible to save it now?
Because the situation is still so dire that we’re facing a global pandemic and the doors of the supermarket should be locked. Even a water-only fast would help to stabilise the situation. Unfortunately, most are doomed, because saving them won’t help – they are often chronically ill anyway, and that does not advance humanity. When these same patients receive further vaccine doses, the body switches entirely to ‘survival’ mode – in other words, it creates a situation where it ‘keeps the body functioning in some way’. The self-healing functions are disabled.
Naturally, the whole process of change takes time – even years as our entire environment, education, shops, medicines, dietary advice, contaminated food and air, vaccines, drugs and so on all form part of a long journey for which a proper guide to health is needed. Where does this knowledge come from? You have to learn for yourself and think for yourself.
Fonte.News, Veiko Huuse, Annika Urm, and many others are following a healthy and enlightened path in harmony with the Creator of the soul and life. If you’re finding it hard to get started and need a “little nudge”, find someone who’s right for you – someone whose energy matches yours – and take it one step at a time.
NB! Every person is at a different stage on this journey, and the path is different for everyone. In fact, everyone has to find their own way. At the same time, someone needs to show the way by example. On the Fonte.News channel, you can read about precisely these topics. Select the category ‘Food’, ‘Health’ or ‘Self-Improvement’, or read Veiko Huuse’s blogs.
After reading this article, some people might take offence, asking, “How can you insult fat people?” Incidentally, when a person is ill, they are indeed overweight, and sometimes we need to show compassion and empathy, because they are, after all, a sick person – a sugar addict, a dopamine addict, lacking in self-respect and self-love, blaming others for everything, and so on. Everyone has, and will continue to have, free will. So there’s no need to take offence – just carry on exactly as you wish. The author and editor of this article do not take offence at the reader’s decisions.
However, if you enjoy this and other Fonte.News articles and consider the work of this channel to be important, please support us:
Written by Annika Urm | Edited by Veiko Huuse
Read more: